Insect management is different from all other aspects of
cotton production. With most insect pests, the situation changes year to year,
week to week, and sometimes field to field. However, one insect that we can
plan on being a consistent threat every year is thrips. This pest will infest
100% of the cotton planted in Alabama every year. What we cannot always predict,
however, is when thrips pressure will peak. In a “normal” year in Alabama, we expect
thrips pressure to be worse on early planted cotton and to be less later in the
planting window as weather conditions improve. In 2021, this was not the case. Spring rains kept weedy hosts viable for a longer period, resulting in thrips
pressure being the greatest on cotton planted after the middle of May. Much of our
cotton was planted in this window and nearly 75% of our acres required a foliar
treatment to supplement at-plant insecticides.
We have several options for at-plant management of thrips
including insecticide seed treatments, and in-furrow liquid or granular
materials. There are pro’s and cons of each approach, so deciding which
strategy to use may make sense for one situation and not for another.
At-Plant Insecticide
Options
Insecticide seed treatments (ISTs) are currently the
industry standard for thrips control, due primarily to the ease of application.
However, under certain conditions control is variable. If conditions are not conducive
to seedling growth, particularly if nighttime temperatures are cool, seed
treatments alone may not provide adequate control. Due to developing
resistance, particularly to thiamethoxam, we recommend seed be treated with an imidacloprid
based seed treatment. There are several brand names, and some include additional
insecticides, but imidacloprid should be a component. Under light to moderate thrips
pressure, ISTs may provide adequate control. Seed could also be treated with
acephate (e.g., Orthene) or acephate could be added to imidacloprid, however in
most cases a bag of over-treated cottonseed cannot be returned if not planted.

Liquid or granular in-furrow insecticide
applications are another at-plant option to manage thrips. These can be used to
replace or supplement an IST. In many cases, in-furrow applications provide
better control of thrips, however using them requires extra equipment, proper calibration
and time when planting. Imidacloprid at the highest labeled rate has
consistently provided good results in our trials across Alabama in recent
years. Acephate has provided more sporadic control, likely due to the wet springs
we have faced over the past 2 years and leaching out the chemical before the
roots can uptake the needed amount to provide control. Aldicarb, now available as
AgLogic15G, is another in-furrow option. This granular product provides excellent
control of thrips and provides control of nematodes as well. Keep in mind that
aldicarb is a restricted use pesticide and additional training may be required
to use this product.
Foliar
Insecticides
Foliar insecticides may be needed to supplement at-plant
treatments. However, foliar applications should never replace an at-plant
insecticide. Thrips can injure seedling cotton until around the 5th
true leaf stage. Research shows that foliar applications are usually most
effective when made at the 1st true leaf stage. The Thrips Infestation
Predictor for Cotton is a reliable tool that predicts the relative risk of
thrips injury for cotton planted at a given location and planting date. To maximize
the accuracy of the model, it should be run for several days before and after
planting, as unpredicted weather patterns may alter the prediction. This tool
should not be used to determine planting dates, but rather to help plan out
fields or planting dates for cotton that will likely need a supplemental foliar
application. Several options are available to use to supplement at-plant
insecticides.
·
Acephate (3 oz/A) is an effective and relatively
inexpensive option, however it has the potential to flare secondary pests such
as spider mites and is the least rainfast of the available recommended options.
·
Bidrin (3.2 oz/A) is another option that is
effective and less likely to flare spider mites and is more rainfast than
acephate, however it is more likely to cause crop injury when tank-mixed with
herbicides.
·
Dimethoate (6.4 oz/A) is another cost effective
and efficacious product with good rainfastness, however it is the most likely
to cause crop injury when tank-mixed with herbicides.
·
Intrepid Edge (3 oz/A) is another effective
option. Intrepid Edge is less likely to flare secondary pests but may need the
addition of a surfactant to help with efficacy.
·
Pyrethroids are not effective and should
not be used to manage thrips.
Effective thrips control is critical to get the 2022 crop off
to a good start. When considering areas to cutback on costs, do not skip out on
at-plant (IST or in-furrow) insecticides. We cannot manage thrips without
having protection for the seedlings as soon as they emerge. If planting into
cool, wet conditions, be prepared to make supplemental foliar sprays to help
seed treatments get seedlings to the 5th true leaf
stage. More information about thrips can be found in Pests of Alabama Cotton:
Thrips (ANR-2718).
For more information on thresholds and insecticide recommendations, visit the
Alabama Cotton IPM Guide (IPM-0415).
To stay up-to-date on the Alabama cotton insect situation, subscribe to the
Alabama Cotton Shorts Newsletter,
Alabama Crops Report Newsletter
and Podcast, and the Syngenta Pest Patrol Hotline.