Monday, June 16, 2025

Tales of Cotton Insects: Monday June 16, 2025

Overall, the cotton insect situation has been quiet this year., which is not unexpected considering how planting season went. Acres will be down significantly this year, how much? We will have to wait to see. Hopefully we will quickly turn into a “normal” summer pattern with scattered (and hopefully timely) storms for the rest of the year.

For the first time in my career, I am getting calls about thrips and plant bugs at the same time (and on top of that, plant bug calls are later than usual too). Plant bugs have been sporadic with most reports being that few are detected in fields. However, we have also received reports of populations well above threshold and square retention in the 65% range. This highlights the importance of scouting and not guessing where plant bugs are (or are not).

This year, as much as any, we cannot afford to allow square retention to fall below threshold, but we also need to manage plant bugs as economically (cheap) as possible. However, achieving adequate control is still our primary goal. Remember, the best way to maximize the return on an insecticide application is to apply it ON TIME. The only way to do this is to scout fields and follow economic thresholds. In pre-bloom cotton, threshold is 8 adult plant bugs per 100 sweeps AND to maintain 80% square retention (note: in late planted cotton, we may want to be more aggressive on square retention to promote earliness).

With that in mind, we have a few options for control of adults in pre-bloom cotton:

1.      Imidacloprid: Many trade names. Imidacloprid is the most economical option we have for plant bug control. While imidacloprid does not provide 100% control (closer to 60-65%) at the highest labeled rates, it generally provides enough to get populations under threshold and preserves square retention

2.      Thiamethoxam: Centric, Hub WDG. Thiamethoxam is another neonicotinoid that provides good control of adult plant bugs. Our general recommendation is 2 oz/A. While a little more costly than imidacloprid, this material provides better control. Another option is Endigo ZCX, which is a premix of Centric (thiamethoxam) and lambda-cy. Endigo ZCX at 3.5 oz/A provides the equivalent rate of Centric (2 oz/A) and lambda-cy (1.5 oz/A). While the added lambda-cy may be more likely to flare mites, this pre-mix may be a little more economical than Centric alone.

3.      Sulfoxaflor: Transform (1.5 oz/A) provides the best control of plant bugs of all currently registered materials. For that reason, we like to wait to use it when immature plant bugs are present. Waiting for Transform can help to delay resistance and manage adults more economically.

4.      Other options: Acephate (0.5 lb) or pyrethroids (highest labeled rate) are options for adults but are not generally recommended. The reason for this is multi-fold. 1. Resistance management. We prefer to use neonics (imidacloprid or thiamethoxam) on adults and then switch to the “harder” chemicals (Ops/pyrethroids) after bloom when targeting immature plant bugs and/or stink bugs. 2. These classes of chemicals tend to be harsher on beneficials, which could lead to outbreaks of spider mite (however, we can and have flared spider mites with neonics sprayed on 7-day intervals). 3. Aphids, while neonics are generally good on aphids, OPs and pyrethroids are not as reliable.

**Note: Pyrethroid resistance has been documented in NW and SW Alabama in recent years. Pyrethroids should be monitored closely for efficacy if used in all cotton growing regions of Alabama.

Complications with adult plant bug management: Adults can continue to move into fields over several weeks as weedy hosts slow play out in wet springs. We suspect this could be the case this year. This may mean we need to spray in consecutive weeks to keep populations below threshold. In these situations, monitoring 1st position square retention on the upper 2-3 nodes is critical. This is really the only way to determine the efficacy of a spray for adults. Since a cotton plant puts on a new node every ≈3 days, we are evaluating new growth the week following an application. As long as square retention is high (>80%), our spray did its job regardless of adult plant bug numbers.

We have also received scattered reports of aphids across the state. In most cases, populations were just high enough to be noticed, but in a few there were enough to piggyback a shot with a trip for PGRs. Generally, we do not see yield benefits to spraying aphids but it can happen. I suspect this year they may have the potential to slow the crop down, particularly if we get dry. Hopefully all the excess moisture we currently have will play in our favor and help the aphid fungus develop a little quicker than normal.

As always, if we can ever be of any help, or if you would like to provide input on the situation in your area, please don’t hesitate to reach out to your local Extension Agent or myself (Scott Graham: 662-809-3368) and Ron Smith (334-332-9501). For more information on thresholds and insecticide recommendations, visit the Alabama Cotton IPM Guide (IPM-0415). To stay up-to-date on the Alabama cotton insect situation, subscribe to the Alabama Cotton Shorts Newsletter, Alabama Crops Report Newsletter and Podcast, and the Syngenta Pest Patrol Hotline.