Stink Bugs Showing Up in Fields

Based on calls from consultants during the past seven days, most insect attention on cotton in Alabama has now shifted to the stink bug complex. This appears to be the appropriate thing to do since no other widespread destructive insect is being reported and a high number of stink bugs are being reported from all the major row crops. This began with wheat during the spring months. Stink bug numbers later shifted to corn. High numbers have been reported in recent weeks in peanuts, with increasing numbers being reported in both cotton and soybeans.

If we back up and review the situation since the end of the 2012 season, this is as expected. Stink bugs built high numbers on soybeans late last season resulting in a high level entering overwintering sites. This past winter was mild and we did not have the excessive high temperatures or extended drought this spring to limit a 2013 population build up.

This complex included both the brown and the southern green species. In the more southern counties within Alabama, the leaf footed bug is also in the mix. Leaf footed bug damage is identical to stink bug damage to cotton bolls. The important thing here is that, control wise, they are more like the brown stink bug. Phosphide insecticides do a much better job in controlling brown stink bugs and leaf footed bugs than do pyrethroids. Growers will need to keep this in mind as they select their chemical for treatment decisions. In Alabama, escape bollworms on Bollgard and Widestrike cotton varieties have not presented a big enough problem to select a pyrethroid over a phosphate for stink bug control. Field monitoring between July 20 and August 10 will determine if that trend holds true for the 2013 season.

In a few weeks, as we begin to make more stink bug control decisions in soybeans, we will have to work more with the pyrethroid chemistry to suppress the brown stink bugs in the complex. Research trials across the south point to bifenthrin as their superior pyrethroid for brown stink bugs in soybeans. We can improve the percent control by using the higher labeled rates.

Back to cotton, here is how we suggest making treatment decisions. First, select a minimum of 25 ten to twelve day old bolls that are still soft to the touch and can be crushed by hand. Select more bolls from at least two locations from larger fields. Crush these bolls and observe for internal injury. Note, it may make this process faster by first separating the bolls with external feeding signs from those that have none. First, crush the bolls with external feeding only and determine the percent that have internal injury. If a threshold is reached, then the remainder of the bolls with no external feeding signs will not need to be crushed. Internal damage may consist of one or more warts on the inside of the boll wall, damaged seed or stained lint. Second, the decision maker needs to know how long that particular field has been in the blooming stage. Most stink bug injury and loss is coming during weeks three though five or six of bloom. This is the period when most harvestable bolls are being set.

In Alabama, I suggest using a 10% internal damage threshold during weeks three though six of bloom. An insecticide application will usually suppress stink bug numbers for seven to ten days unless a field borders another untreated crop with high numbers of stink bugs. If has been my experience that stink bugs do not move rapidly across fields like plant bugs as they reinfest. The first four to ten rows adjacent to corn or peanuts seem to get most of the migration initially.

In our heaviest stink bugs years, cotton in the coastal plains of the southeast have required up to four applications. Under most conditions however, only two or three sprays may be warranted.

One last thing I will mention today is that, in the past, stink bugs seem to cause more internal boll damage in wet seasons than in dry seasons. That being the case, and unless the weather changes, we need to be extra cautious of stink bug damage to cotton in 2013.

Update for the Week of September 9

As we observed and stated last week, soybeans in Alabama are experiencing the most widespread outbreak of foliage feeding insects of the past 41 seasons. This outbreak has been going on for about three weeks or more. However, some growers are just now discovering the situation. This has led to the most calls and questions that Dr. Tim Reed and I have ever received during one week. I will attempt to summarize the questions and what our responses have been.

Most calls begin with – “I have worms in my soybeans, when do I need to treat and what insecticide do I need to use?”

First of all, in most all fields we are dealing with a mix of soybean loopers (SL), velvetbean caterpillars (VBC), and green cloverworms (GCW). Loopers are statewide, VBC are a significant part of the mix in south and central Alabama while GCW are a large part of the mix in northern areas of the state. Loopers are resistant to pyrethroids, Lannate and all of the older chemistry. Since they are part of the mix statewide, we must go to the newer chemistry (in alphabetical order): Belt 3 oz.; Blackhawk (Tracer) 2 oz.; Intrepid 4-8 oz.; or Steward 7 oz. Prices for Belt, Blackhawk and Steward will be somewhere between $15 and $20 per acre. Intrepid will range from about $7 to $14, depending on the rate used. The 4 oz. rate has been what most growers have chosen due to economics. However, where significant foliage loss has already occurred and worm numbers are high, this 4 oz. rate is not adequate. At least 5 or 6 oz. of Intrepid will be needed.

In addition to worms, most all soybean fields have some level of stink bugs present. None of the worm materials will control stink bugs. Therefore, a pyrethroid or acephate (Orthene or generic) at 0.75 lb./ai must be added. This rate of acephate makes pyrethroids the most economic choice. The majority of our stink bugs are the green or southern green species, which pyrethroids control very well.

Now back to what a threshold is on foliage loss. Depending on the stage of beans, our threshold is 20-30% foliage loss. That does not mean that we wait for that level before treating. We treat in advance when we find worm numbers that will give that level of loss. Also, we must allow 4-5 days for products like Intrepid to control the worms. However, foliage consumption will normally end much sooner. Big factors, which are seldom mentioned in discussing foliage loss thresholds in soybeans, are the amount of moisture available to the crop and the reproductive stage of the beans. Soybeans can compensate at a much higher level when soil moisture is available and we have that statewide at present. Also, soybeans will replace lost foliage when they are still in the blooming stage.

How many worms does it take to cause 20-30% foliage loss? In traditional row beans, where a drop cloth can be used, somewhere between 4 and 8 larvae per row foot will give 20-30% foliage loss. The size of the beans is also a variable here. Due to the good moisture in August, many of our beans are waist high and have lots of foliage. Many of our beans in 2012 are drilled. Therefore, a sweep net is needed to get a measure of worm numbers. I suggest taking 10 sweep samples. Some states recommend treatment when about one larva per sweep is found. I have found in 2012 that it takes about 3 or 4 worms per sweep to cause 20-30% foliage loss. Another factor to consider is how long the worm infestation has been ongoing. In fields I have monitored, the answer is three or more weeks. New worms just keep hatching, so where a subthreshold has been present for 15-20 days, much of the lower canopy has already been consumed by the worms. In this situation a 10% foliage loss can turn into a 30-40% loss in 7 days.

In summary, I feel that our Extension educational program on soybean insects has been very inadequate and we promise to do better beginning with winter meetings. However, growers must also do their part in managing insects in soybeans, especially when they are worth $17-18 per bushel. We do not know what level of insect pressure 2013 will present, but if we plan to stay on top of the insect situation, soybeans will need to be monitored by a trained or experienced person at least weekly during the season, just like we have done in cotton for the last 60 years.

Overview of 2011 Cotton Insect Season

Early Season Pests
Thrips were extremely heavy from about April 15 to May 20. A major contributor to this heavy migration of thrips from wild hosts and wheat into cotton was the extreme drought conditions and absence of rainfall events during this period.

Plant Bugs
One peak movement of adult TPB into cotton occurred between June 20 and July 1. The majority of this infestation only happened in the earlier planted fields (most mature cotton). One insecticide application was targeted to these adult TPB’s when they were detected. Few immatures were detected in these fields in the coming weeks, so no in-field generation occurred. This may have been influenced by the extreme temperatures that occurred during this period (98-102⁰F).

Bollworm
Subeconomic numbers of bollworms occurred over an extended period from about July 15 to August 10. Few fields ever reached treatment threshold. 2011 was like the lowest bollworm pressure year on record. End-of-season damage boll counts on untreated genetic cotton were less than one boll per 10 feet.

Tobacco Budworm
Budworm numbers were non-detectable to extremely light all season long. Budworm larvae were too low to detect on conventional cotton and even on attractive crops such as tobacco when used as a sentinel crop.

Aphids
Aphid numbers were very slow to build in 2011 but also slow to crash due to naturally occurring diseases. The fungal disease was slow to develop which left aphids in the system much later than normal. Aphids normally peak and crash prior to, or at, the early boll set stage but this did not happen in 2011. Also, observations indicated a resurgence of aphids in the mid canopy area of the plants in late season as opposed to the terminal area.

Stink Bugs
Stink bugs in 2011 were fewest in number and damage of any year since the boll weevil was eradicated. This was likely due to the colder than normal winter temperature effect on the southern green species and the extreme spring heat and drought effect on the brown species. The majority of the few stink bugs observed in 2011 was the brown species.

Fall Armyworms
The “rice or grass” strain of the fall armyworm was abundant over much of the season in pastures, hay, and grasses. This strain will feed on peanuts but not on corn or cotton. They are easy to control on pastures with pyrethroids and numerous other labeled agricultural insecticides.